Sage

View Original

Managing coronavirus as a global megaproject

This blog post originally appeared on the UCL Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management news blog.

From Project Management Journal

The University College London (UCL) Bartlett School of Construction and Management’s Dr. Juliano Denicol and Professor Andrew Davies connect concepts from their recent research on megaprojects with the managerial challenges of the global response to COVID-19. 

Dr. Juliano Denicol states, “We are probably dealing with the largest project in modern times, triggering an unprecedented cross-country collaboration. The scale is uncharted and probably thousands of times bigger than megaprojects, in the order of Teraprojects or Petaprojects.”

The research addresses the challenges involved in managing megaprojects, defined as “the delivery model used to produce large-scale, complex, and one-off capital investments in a variety of public and private sectors.” But there have been few, if any, projects of this scale and urgency in human history. The paper suggests managerial solutions after reviewing more than 6,000 papers associated with the most complex and challenging megaprojects reported so far.

Since the publication of the paper in February 2020, the coronavirus pandemic has swept the world with global cases breaking past 1.9 million and deaths over 115,000 globally in April 2020. The pandemic faces many of the same pitfalls identified in the paper including the handling of stakeholder, leadership and industrial orchestration.

Dr. Juliano Denicol commented, “We are observing the emergence of interconnected megaprojects at different levels aiming to stabilize economies and solve the health crisis. Given the complexity, scale and scarcity of resources (at country and global scales), we have one ultimate global project, to win the battle against the virus. Below this level, several nations are coordinating the emergence of their portfolio of megaprojects (meta-megaproject management), with each country developing megaprojects across several industrial sectors, not only to address the needs of the crisis, but also to save entire industries with a combination of different incentive packages and solutions. One of the future avenues proposed by our research anticipated this challenge, where we emphasized the design of the system architecture to deal with multiple levels and layers.”

Professor Andrew Davies said, “Countries face the challenge of planning and dealing with this emergency. What is interesting is various ways countries are attempting to tackle the problem. Some are adopting a rapid and proactive approach to manage and contain the pandemic (e.g. China and Korea), while others have been slow, cumbersome and ineffectual (e.g. USA). Our research is clear about the key role of leadership in megaprojects to build teams and collaborations between the public and private sectors often across national boundaries, and the need for global collaboration applies to COVID-19 perhaps more than any other megaproject. Beyond transparency and lack of ambiguity, global megaprojects of this magnitude require leaders who understand the whole picture, build bridges between multiple stakeholders, integrate the various pieces of activity and provide managers with the resources, power and autonomy required to manage parts of the project.”

Although the COVID-19 is a challenging time for all, Denicol and Davies suggest that it is essential to put in place mechanisms to learn lessons and capture the strategies and practices developed to address the emergency. This could later be used by government agencies of each country, and to address other global emergencies such as climate change and poverty. It is important to change the narrative of measuring megaproject success only by its final cost, shifting towards unpacking the solutions, which was one of the inspiring drivers of the research.

Additional Reading: Inverse: Coronavirus: What Building Airports Can Teach Us About How to Respond

Article details

What Are the Causes and Cures of Poor Megaproject Performance? A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
Juliano Denicol, Andrew Davies, Ilias Krystallis
First published February 13, 2020 Research Article
DOI: 10.1177/8756972819896113
From Project Management Journal


Juliano Denicol

Juliano Denicol is Lecturer in Project Management at the School of Construction and Project Management, the Bartlett Faculty of the Built Environment, University College London. His research explores the management of megaprojects through several lenses, emphasizing the design of client organizations and inter-organizational structures. His previous research has included several iconic UK megaprojects: High Speed 1, Heathrow Airport Terminal 5, London 2012 Olympics, Crossrail, Thames Tideway Tunnel, and High Speed 2. He has worked as a supply chain management consultant at High Speed 2, the largest infrastructure project in Europe, and as an advisor to the European Commission on public procurement policies of large infrastructure projects. He is part of Project X, a major research network that aims to improve major project delivery in the UK, established by nine universities in collaboration with the Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) and the Cabinet Office. His work on megaprojects has been regarded of high global impact, receiving research awards from the Project Management Institute (PMI), the Major Projects Association (MPA), and the International Project Management Association (IPMA). He is the recipient of the prestigious 2019 Global Young Researcher Award from IPMA and the 2019 Best Reviewer Award from the Project Organising Special Interest Group of the European Academy of Management (EURAM). He can be contacted at juliano.denicol@ucl.ac.uk.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Juliano_Denicol

LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/juliano-denicol

See this content in the original post